🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an event that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate events where African descendants are paid to talk to predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since that time, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the celebration is celebrated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the recent season we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A effort to scrub Black history and narrative from the records is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the month represents how minimally it can be influential if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the situation of the current era. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month entirely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed across all seasons (as various establishments are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not avoid politics, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Organizations who observe it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and alertness to minor insults, but faced with the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.